Nielsen v. Contracting v. Applied Underwriters, Inc., No. D072393M (D4d1 May 23, 2018)
It is well-settled that an arbitration agreement can delegate questions of arbitrability to an arbitrator, but only if it specifically says so. But even if the agreement contains a delegation clause, a court still must resolve challenges to the delegation clause itself in the first instance. The Court here holds that courts’ responsibility to address delegation issue remains even when a party’s defense to delegation clause would also be a defense to the entire agreement to arbitrate.
Here, the delegation clause was invalid because it was contained in an insurance contract whose form had not been approved by the Insurance Commissioner. And the arbitration agreement more generally was also invalid for the same reason. So the trial court didn’t err in denying a motion to compel arbitration.
Affirmed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment