Chodos v. Borman, No. B260326 (D2d5 August 18, 2015)
This is an appeal after remand of this case, where the court of appeal modified a judgment in a quantum meruit case because the trial court for permitted the jury to include a lodestar multiplier when calculating an attorney’s fees owed by his former client. The question on this second appeal is: From when and for how much does post-judgment interest run? The court holds that because the prior appeal only reduced the amount of the judgment, but did not reverse it on the merits, post-judgment interest should run from the date of the original judgment, but in the modified amount.
Reversed.
FWIW, this is the 400th post on this blog. Thanks to our readers for all your support!
Showing posts with label subsequent appeals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label subsequent appeals. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...