Swanson v. Cnty. of Riverside, No. D075081 (D4d1 Jun 17, 2019)
A county’s decision to release an individual from a 72-hour mental health hold under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act is not speech. So a claim based on the County’s allegedly negligent release of a mentally ill person—who proceeds to kill three people with a baseball bat shortly his release—is not a SLAPP. Enough said.
Affirmed.
Showing posts with label negligence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label negligence. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 3, 2019
Thursday, March 15, 2018
Post #800: An Issue of Duty
Klean Hollywood LLC v. Superior Court, No. B283816 (D2d4 Mar. 8, 2018)
This isn’t about procedure, but it is my 800th post, and a good life lesson nonetheless:
If you are a heroin addict and check into a rehab, and then proceed to smuggle in heroin on which you OD, you don’t get to sue the rehab for negligence for failing to stop you from doing that.
Writ granted.
This isn’t about procedure, but it is my 800th post, and a good life lesson nonetheless:
If you are a heroin addict and check into a rehab, and then proceed to smuggle in heroin on which you OD, you don’t get to sue the rehab for negligence for failing to stop you from doing that.
Writ granted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...