Lacayo v. Catalina Rest. Grp., Inc., No. E069833 (D4d1 Aug. 1, 2019)
Not sure why this was published. Two pretty basic points: (1) When a court partially grants and partially denies a motion to compel arbitration, only the denial is an appealable order, because that is what the statute says; and (2) when the arb clause has a carve out for unfair competition claims, unfair competition claims are not arbitrable.
Affirmed.
Showing posts with label catalina restaurant group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label catalina restaurant group. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...