Potential arbitrators are required to make disclosures of
potential conflicts. Many of the arbitration service providers accomplish this
through a questionnaire where the arbitrator walks through a series of
questions. In this case, the arbitrator’s disclosure consisted of 28 questions
over 11 pages. To question 28, which asked if the arbitrator would entertain
any other offers of employment from the parties while the case is pending, the
arbitrator answered, “yes,” that he or she* would consider offers to serve as
an arbitrator in other matters for the parties or their counsel. Unfortunately,
the eleventh page of the disclosures was missing.
Showing posts with label honeycutt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label honeycutt. Show all posts
Thursday, October 11, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...