Little v. Pullman, No. B238137 (D2d1 Sept. 9, 2013)
In a somewhat bizarre battle over George Jefferson’s residuals, the court holds that the defendant cannot unilaterally rescind a settlement agreement in order to invoke an arbitration clause in an earlier agreement that was novated by the settlement.
Showing posts with label george jefferson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label george jefferson. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...