Cnty. of L.A. Bd. of Supervisors v. Superior Court, No. B257320A (D2d3 Jun. 22, 2017)
This is the remand in County of L.A. v. Superior Court, the Supreme Court’s big decision on the scope of the attorney client privilege from the end of 2016. As when this case was before the Court of Appeal the first time around, the panel seems inclined to read the privilege expansively, even after getting reversed for doing that the first time around.
Showing posts with label in the course of. Show all posts
Showing posts with label in the course of. Show all posts
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Friday, January 6, 2017
Back from the Brink on the Attorney Client-Privilege
County of L.A. v. Superior Court, No. S226645 (Cal. Dec. 29, 2016)
As Joe Biden might say, this 4-3 Supreme Court opinion on the attorney-client privilege is a big f@*king deal.
As Joe Biden might say, this 4-3 Supreme Court opinion on the attorney-client privilege is a big f@*king deal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...