Chen v. Berenjian, G055496 (D4d3 Mar. 28, 2019)
In an effort to avoid Creditor’s collections efforts, Judgment Debtor and his Brother engineered a collusive default judgment and then an execution that let Brother obtain possession of all of JD’s assets, including in particular a pair of stereo speakers. Creditor tries to levy on the speakers, and after learning that they were transferred to Brother based on the default, sues Brother for fraudulent transfer.
The trial court dismissed the claim, finding it was barred by Civil Code § 47(b)’s absolute litigation privilege. But that misunderstands the nature of the claim. It was not really based on the default judgment. It was based on the wrongful transfer of the speakers to someone who didn’t have a bona fide claim to them. That isn’t communicative, so the litigation privilege does not apply.
Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment