Martinez v. O’Hara, No. G065950 (D3d3 Feb. 28, 2019)
The notice of appeal in this case refereed to the (female) trial judge as a “succubus.” For those without a copy of the Monster Manual on hand, that’s “a demon assuming female form which has sexual intercourse with men in their sleep.”
That, plus several baseless claims in briefs that the trial judge got the law wrong on purpose, get Plaintiff’s attorney in this case called out by name and referred to the California State Bar. Indeed, this is an otherwise unpublished opinion, but the 4/3 went out of its way to publish this part to lay down a marker that sexist bullshit like that
isn’t going to fly.
Good for them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment