Sierra Palms Homeowners Assoc. v. Metro Gold Line Extension Construction Authority, No. B275241 (D2d7 Jan. 29, 2018).
California has an inefficient rule that if a demurrer is granted against you, you can argue for the first time on appeal that you should have been afforded leave to amend. Indeed, the standard is codified expressly into Code of Civil Procedure § 472c(a). And that’s what happens here. On remand, Plaintiff gets to amend to add an inverse condemnation claim against one of the Defendants, even though it never requested that relief in superior court.
Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment