Bower v. Inter-Con Security Sys., Inc., No. A135940 (D1d3 Dec. 31, 2014)
This is a wage and hour class action where the plaintiff signed an employment agreement containing an arbitration provision with a class action waiver. But the employer didn’t immediately move to compel. Instead, it both responded to and propounded discovery, including discovery on class issues. Only after plaintiff tried to expand the class and efforts to settle the case on a class-wide basis failed did it move to compel the case to arbitration. But the trial court ruled that, by that time, it had waived the right to compel. The court of appeal affirms. Although the evidence on the issue was mixed there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s decision that defendant was aware of its right to arbitrate, that it acted inconsistently with that right, and that plaintiff was prejudiced.
Affirmed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...
No comments:
Post a Comment