Ellis v. U.S. Security Associates, No. A136028 (D1d2 Mar. 20, 2014)
The court holds that a contractual shortening of a statute of limitations contained in an employment application to six months is unreasonable and thus unenforceable. Particularly given that the statutorily mandated pre-litigation Fair Employment and Housing Act administrative process can be expected to last up to two years, six months is just too short to be reasonable. Which makes sense. The opinion is mostly notable for taking the defendant’s attorney to task for fast and loose case citations in his brief.
Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...
No comments:
Post a Comment