Martin-Bragg v. Moore, No. B238772 (D2d1 Sept. 3, 2013)
In a colorful unlawful detainer case
between parties with significant romantic and financial back stories, in which
pretty much every document is asserted to be a forgery, a pro se appellant
manages to overturn a UD judgment against him because the dispute implicated
the underlying title to the property. Because the title dispute—which was
pending in a separate case—raised complex issues of fact, the court of appeal
held that trial court should have consolidated the cases and treated the
consolidated dispute as a regular civil case. By effectively deciding the title
issue in under summary UD procedures that afford no discovery, the trial court
erred in a manner that prejudiced appellant’s rights to have the title issue
resolved in an ordinary civil case with full procedural protections. Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...
No comments:
Post a Comment