Six4three v. Facebook, Inc., No. A156095 (May 18, 2020)
Plaintiff in an anti-SLAPP fight filed a declaration in support of its opposition that included hundreds of exhibits that had been designated as confidential under a protective order. After the motion was resolved, the trial court struck from the record a whole bunch of exhibits that were not germane to the motion. It also ordered parts of some exhibits sealed. Plaintiff appeals.
The Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal. The striking order is not an appealable order. Any appeal to it would have to be taken up in connection with an appeal of the anti-SLAPP ruling or from a final judgment. And so far as sealing order goes, Plaintiff isn’t aggrieved. Sealing prevents the general public from accessing the documents. But it has no effect on Plaintiff’s rights—plaintiff has copies of the documents already. Since Code of Civil Procedure § 902 limits appeals to a “party aggrieved,” Plaintiff lacks standing to appeal the sealing order.
Appeal dismissed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...
No comments:
Post a Comment