Potential arbitrators are required to make disclosures of
potential conflicts. Many of the arbitration service providers accomplish this
through a questionnaire where the arbitrator walks through a series of
questions. In this case, the arbitrator’s disclosure consisted of 28 questions
over 11 pages. To question 28, which asked if the arbitrator would entertain
any other offers of employment from the parties while the case is pending, the
arbitrator answered, “yes,” that he or she* would consider offers to serve as
an arbitrator in other matters for the parties or their counsel. Unfortunately,
the eleventh page of the disclosures was missing.
Showing posts with label honeycutt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label honeycutt. Show all posts
Thursday, October 11, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...