Ryder v. Lightstorm Entm’t, No. B254922 (D2d8 Apr. 22, 2016)
This is mostly a case about the merits (or the lack thereof) of a Desny claim alleging that James Cameron stole the idea for Avatar from Plaintiff's idea for a film called KRZ. According to the court, he didn’t. But I don't blog on idea submissions cases, although I've done some in my time. There is, however, a single paragraph that deals with an interesting evidentiary issue.
Showing posts with label presumptions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label presumptions. Show all posts
Thursday, May 26, 2016
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Dawn, I Want You Back . . .
In re Marriage of Valli, No. S193990 (Cal. May 15, 2014)
Frankie Valli and his ex-wife are in a very long-running dispute about whether a life insurance policy that Frankie bought during the marriage is community or separate property. In ruling forthe ex-Mrs. Mr. Valli,* the Cal. Supremes hold that the Family Code’s rules about the characterization of community property trump Evidence Code § 662’s presumption that a title holder is the actual owner of property. Justice Chin’s concurrence elaborates on the issue, explaining key differences between California’s Spanish-based family law and that in common law jurisdictions.
Frankie Valli and his ex-wife are in a very long-running dispute about whether a life insurance policy that Frankie bought during the marriage is community or separate property. In ruling for
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...