Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. B247672 (D2d7, as modified Feb. 8, 2016)
This is an automotive products liability case mostly about when plaintiffs can admit evidence of industry custom to show a defect under the risk-benefit test. (The answer, according to the court, is sometimes, parting ways with other courts that have said always and never.) The court also, however, briefly tackles two points of procedural interest.
Showing posts with label toyota motor corp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label toyota motor corp. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...