Golfer is in a dispute with his Country Club over dues. Golfer
cross-claimed against the Club and its Current and Former Owners. While Former
Owners’ demurrer to Golfer’s first amended cross-claim was pending, Golfer filed
a second amended cross-claim, without seeking leave to do so. The trial court struck the SACC. It
then granted the demurrer to the FACC, without leave, except as to a claim for
declaratory relief. The trial court later granted Former Owners judgment on
the pleadings on the dec. relief claim, finding that it was moot. Golfer
appealed. The trial court then denied Golfer’s request to stay the case as to
the claims as to the Club and the Current Owners pending appeal.
Showing posts with label hedwall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hedwall. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...