Kelly v. House, No. A153735 (D1d1 Apr. 2, 2020)
This is a pretty nasty land dispute over a right of first refusal to buy some farmland. The prevailing Plaintiffs sought attorneys’ fees under various theories, but allegedly filed their fee app a day too late under Rule of Court 3.1702(b), which requires it to be filed within the time to file a notice of appeal. But defendants didn’t raise the timeliness argument before the trial court. And the Court of Appeal finds that they forfeited it.
Which is fine, because although the Court of Appeal doesn’t say so here, the deadlines in Rule 3.1702 are not jurisdictional. They can be extended for good cause, and consequently, objections based upon them can be forfeited by failing to timely raise them in superior court.
The Court of Appeal goes on to partially reverse for a different reason.
Reversed in part.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment