Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. SMG Holdings, Inc., C082841 (D3 Jan. 28, 2020)
Entity X claims coverage under an insurance policy as an additional insured. The policy has an arbitration clause. Even though X never signed the policy, it can be compelled to arbitration, whether as a third party beneficiary or under an estoppel theory.
Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...
No comments:
Post a Comment