Savea v. YRC Inc., No. 152379 (D1d3 Apr. 10, 2019)
A demurring defendant asked for judicial notice of a document in its reply brief. New evidence on reply is generally not ok. But when it doesn’t raise new theories or arguments and simply responds to points raised in an opposition, a court has discretion to consider it nonetheless.
Affirmed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've Moved ....
After a two-year hiatus, 111 North Hill Street has decided to decamp for Substack. Thank you for your readership over the last twelve year...
-
Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , No. B252995 (D2d4, as modified August 20, 2015) Although some law-and-economics attuned federal judges...
-
The Rossdale Grp. v. Walton , No. H043476 (D6 Apr. 15, 2017) This is a weird and kind of narrow opinion about standing that is mostly shap...
No comments:
Post a Comment