Martane v. Heavenly Valley Ltd. P’Ship, No. C076998 (D3 Sept. 26, 2018)
Sometimes it fees like there’s a kind of Jungian collective unconscious in published Court of Appeal decisions. A random, obscure issue will go unnoticed for years. And then multiple opinions will address it, often close in time, and frequently without acknowledging each other.
Apropos of my last post, this opinion deals with the general assumption or risk doctrine in connection with skiing accidents. This time at Heavenly instead of Mammoth. Nothing of procedural interest here. It’s just a little weird how that happens.
No comments:
Post a Comment