Huang v. Hanks, No. C084702 (D3 May 10, 2018)
Plaintiff, who is apparently mentally ill, has sought civil harassment restraining orders against, inter alios, Tom Hanks, Monica Lewinski, and the Dali Lama. The trial court denied the applications and threw out the claims as patently frivolous. While there’s no statute that specifically authorizes a court to dismiss cases that are facially ludicrous, the court here holds the trial court had the inherent power to do so. And, for that matter, the appeal is frivolous too, given that the Plaintiff’s assertions of error have no support at all in the record.
Affirmed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Trashing your Neighbors Is Not Speech in the Public Interest
Dubac v. Itkoff , No. B317061 (D2d8 Apr. 19, 2024) This is an ugly beef between n eighbors who dislike each other. A lot. Over a several mon...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
No comments:
Post a Comment