Monsivaiz v. Civil Serv. Comm’n of the Cnty. of L.A., No. B254859 (D2d8, as further modified May 12, 2015)
While his petition for a writ ordering the LA Civil Service Commission to reinstate his job as an agricultural inspector was pending, petitioner died. His wife tried to sub in has his successor in interest. The trial court denied relief, finding that since its only power in mandamus was to order the commission to reinstate, it could not award the wife any relief cognizable on a writ, and thus that it lacked jurisdiction. The court here affirms. The wife might have a claim for back pay. But that wasn’t properly addressed on a writ to the Civil Service Commission, whose authority was limited to ordering the petitioner reinstated. Which is of course impossible, because he is dead.
Affirmed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment