Ellis v. U.S. Security Associates, No. A136028 (D1d2 Mar. 20, 2014)
The court holds that a contractual shortening of a statute of limitations contained in an employment application to six months is unreasonable and thus unenforceable. Particularly given that the statutorily mandated pre-litigation Fair Employment and Housing Act administrative process can be expected to last up to two years, six months is just too short to be reasonable. Which makes sense. The opinion is mostly notable for taking the defendant’s attorney to task for fast and loose case citations in his brief.
Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment