Martin-Bragg v. Moore, No. B238772 (D2d1 Sept. 3, 2013)
In a colorful unlawful detainer case
between parties with significant romantic and financial back stories, in which
pretty much every document is asserted to be a forgery, a pro se appellant
manages to overturn a UD judgment against him because the dispute implicated
the underlying title to the property. Because the title dispute—which was
pending in a separate case—raised complex issues of fact, the court of appeal
held that trial court should have consolidated the cases and treated the
consolidated dispute as a regular civil case. By effectively deciding the title
issue in under summary UD procedures that afford no discovery, the trial court
erred in a manner that prejudiced appellant’s rights to have the title issue
resolved in an ordinary civil case with full procedural protections. Reversed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That's Not a Debate
Taylor v. Tesla , No. A168333 (D1d4 Aug. 8, 2024) Plaintiffs in this case are also members of a class in a race discrimination class action ...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
No comments:
Post a Comment